"BLACK SKIN AND BLOOD": DOCUMENTARY PHOTOGRAPHY AND SANTU MOFOKENG'S CRITIQUE OF THE VISUALIZATION OF APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA
-
Copy number Shelfmark Shelf mark R073666 Ned. Fotomuseum ned. fotomuseum
Title"BLACK SKIN AND BLOOD": DOCUMENTARY PHOTOGRAPHY AND SANTU MOFOKENG'S CRITIQUE OF THE VISUALIZATION OF APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA
Author
Edition[nummer] 4
[jaargang] 48
[tijdschrift; titel] History and Theory
[tijdschrift; maand] december
[tijdschrift; pagina] 52-58
Photographer
Year of publication2009
Materialartikel
Document TypeArticle
SubjectGeschiedenis en fotografie, Foto als historisch document, Documentaire fotografie (teksten over), Fotojournalistiek (teksten over), digitaal beschikbaar
Abstract
Abstract:
This paper responds to Patricia Hayes’s insightful readings of Santu Mofokeng’s photographic work in South Africa. The paper operates from the premise that photography is a technology of visualization that both draws on and establishes a visual economy through which events and issues are materialized in particular ways. This allows the paper to pose questions and develop understandings about Mofokeng’s work in terms of the way certain factors coalesced to enable a particular representation of black South Africans in the global image economy. Central to this is the role of assumptions about exposure and visibility in relation to violence, assumptions that Mofokeng’s work, as a critique of conventional documentary work, explicitly contests. In exploring the invisibility of everyday life, Mofokeng expands notions of documentary photography and photojournalism. This paper demonstrates this point by connecting Mofokeng’s work to a contemporary controversy in European photojournalism to highlight how a more complex understanding of documentary
photography is necessary.
This paper responds to Patricia Hayes’s insightful readings of Santu Mofokeng’s photographic work in South Africa. The paper operates from the premise that photography is a technology of visualization that both draws on and establishes a visual economy through which events and issues are materialized in particular ways. This allows the paper to pose questions and develop understandings about Mofokeng’s work in terms of the way certain factors coalesced to enable a particular representation of black South Africans in the global image economy. Central to this is the role of assumptions about exposure and visibility in relation to violence, assumptions that Mofokeng’s work, as a critique of conventional documentary work, explicitly contests. In exploring the invisibility of everyday life, Mofokeng expands notions of documentary photography and photojournalism. This paper demonstrates this point by connecting Mofokeng’s work to a contemporary controversy in European photojournalism to highlight how a more complex understanding of documentary
photography is necessary.
| Copy number | R073666 |
| Institution name | |
| Shelf mark | ned. fotomuseum |